So what can you say about this? Tragic, yes, but his legacy casts a shadow over Venezuela and Latin America.
Chavez
was very popular with common people and spent a lot of money on
projects to help them. But with little transparency, lack of political
checks and balances and no accountability, hundreds of billions of
dollars were wasted and stolen. First that
means many projects were never completed - casting doubt on official
poverty-reduction figures. if a clinic or hospital is never completed
you can't count those hospital beds; the same goes for tons of
containers of food that rotted in warehouses. Also it created a new
class of multi-millionaires and further enriching Venezuela's
traditional oligarchs. Chavez' State Capitalism enriched a lot of
people at the very top.
Remember
in a decade of historically high oil prices Chavez presided over a
country with the biggest oil reserves in the world. He came into power
with a barrel of oil at $10 dollars it climbed to $150 With this
unprecedented bounty poverty SHOULD HAVE been
reduced. You could hand out cash to poor people. Indeed, in previous
governments during oil booms social spending was about the same
percentage of GDP. People
forget Venezuela had Social-Democratic governments that subsidized
housing, education and health, well before Chavez. Chavez spent a lot of
money and poverty did go down, but with the kind of money available and spent you would expect a stronger overall picture, which still is not true, due to
waste, corruption and inefficiency. He
has plowed through a trillion dollars in oil revenue and somehow left a
country with the regions highest inflation, food scarcities, weak
currency, indebted, infrastructure collapsing
No comments:
Post a Comment