Some see the Chavez regime as a benign entity that shares the oil wealth of the country with the poor for the first time in Venezuelan history. Amazing how some will excuse away authoritarian tendencies or wasteful incompetence with an argument that seems to boil down to what I would call "but..it has its heart in the right place."
Truth of the matter is that the Chavez government has become one of the most corrupt governments in Latin America in recent times. It has also enjoyed a windfall of one trillion dollars in oil revenue, since the price of a barrel of oil has gone from 8 bucks a barrel to 100+ while Chavez is in office. Sure, it claims it has directed 300 billion dollars to social programs, which on paper might be true, but its hard to see where all that money goes. With little oversight or accountability hundreds of billions of dollars are not accounted for, and are prime candidates for corruption by government officials and friendly businessmen.
Which Brings Us To Capital Flight - And Hugo's Big Mouth.
Opposition newspaper Tal Cual, editorial called El Saqueo "The Plunder", by Carlos Diaz, reported on statements President Hugo Chavez on September 11, 2012. President Chavez stated there was more than 400 Billions of Venezuelan dollars in foreign fiscal paradises.
President Hugo Chavez was citing statistics from the Tax Justice Network, an English NGO whose issue is concern with unrecorded, untaxed private wealth being squirreled away in offshore havens. The latest and very publicized TJN report in 2012 was The Price Of Offshore Revisited. by James S. Henry, which used new criteria to measure the amount of untaxed private wealth that has accumulated in offshore tax havens and the largest 50 banks in the world the past 40 years. The reports appendix had statistics on estimated "private Venezuelan funds directed to fiscal paradises during the period 1970-2010.' according to Diaz. TJN measures pre-tax private wealth that flows to tax havens including First World banks.
When Chavez was probably referring to was the sum of 400 Billion dollars which is estimated to be the dollar amount of the value of off-the-books private capital that has fled Venezuela the past 40 years plus what this capital it has earned in returns. Diaz correctly notes that while Chavez uses the data to "demonize" prior governments, the reports findings are especially damning to his government.
Chávez se agarró de esta cifra para demonizar el esquema institucional previo a su gobierno que mantenía un cambio libre y obligaba a Pdvsa a entregar al Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV) todos sus ingresos en moneda extranjera. Según el mandatario, estos mecanismos sólo facilitaban que los venezolanos sacaran dinero del país. Pero como suele ocurrir, a Chávez le echaron mal el cuento.De la lectura del reporte se concluye que Venezuela no está sola en la problemática de la fuga de divisas. En términos nominales nuestro país ocupa el tercer lugar detrás de Brasil y México, y apenas por encima de Argentina; mientras que en términos reales sólo nos supera Brasil. Ahora bien, el aspecto importante a considerar es cuándo se produjeron esas fugas.
Basically, if you look at the report, most of the Capital Flight has been continuous under Chavez. Not only is Chavez off-base, he is damned by the report. He is responsible for 55% of the total capital flight for the period 1970-2010. Venezuela government corruption and economic mismanagement were notorious before Chavez, and the charts reflect that fact. There was massive plunder of oil revenues in the 70's, during the 90's bank crisis' billions left the country, which is what Chavez supporters often point to (correctly). But still during 1999-2010 period, more pre-tax dollars ended up abroad than during the "Venezuelan Saudi" period of the 70's and 80's and the "Neo-Liberal" 90's combined.
the chart on page 23 of Appendix 3 of the report shows this well:
What does this say about corruption?
Venezuelas economy and revenues mostly come from extracting oil, and from the national oil company PDSVA. This capital flight happened under a government with strict capital and currency controls, and where the government controls a substantial part of the economy. Private Sector activities in the traditional agricultural and manufacturing sector have suffered, due to government policies of expropriations, price controls and currency controls, That also dries them up as potential sources of capital flight.. The government is flush with cash, and spends a lot of it which ends up being filtered out to a parasitic Private Sector that acts as subcontractors and bankers for the inefficient and wasteful state. The government has also been directly involved by selling billions of dollar denominated bonds at artificially low exchange rates, so private buyers can deposit them in foreign accounts and the government can spend more money to buy votes.
Brazil and Mexico have large and more diversified economies with actual multi-nationals. Together with Argentina, over the past 40 years have well-documented histories of economic collapses and debt. We just need to look at the financial crisis that bookended the 90's in Brazil to find some explanations for capital flight. Mexico went through a horrible crisis in the early 80's, the Tequila crisis in the 90's and this decade has the U.S. Great Recession and drug violence and money laundering.
All 3 of these countries have a long history of government corruption that also explains their capital flight. Mexico under the PRI in the 70's and 80's produced multi-millionaires (Lopez Portillo or Salinas De Gortari anyone?)
Yet in Chavez' Venezuela is a bigger exporter of unreported dollars to private bank accounts than trillion dollar economies like Brazil or Mexico. Private individuals in a revolutionary government, somehow end up exporting billions in capital beating out legendary oil-flush thieveocracies like the PRI of the 70's and their own homegrown ADN/Copei. That says a lot about the rot at the core of Chavez supposed Boliviarian Revolution.
